*BEST OF DTB #74* God’s Girl: Choosing hell is optional

Posted by John Benko - March 31st, 2011

Choosing hell is optional Posted on March 31, 2011 by Jojo Freewill has been given to us, & will never be revoked. It’s OUR LIVES, & God will not stand in the way. We MAY choose hell, it’s one of our options.

This is my biggest struggle with God: Why, Jesus, do You allow us to crash our lives & choose devastation, for ourselves & for others?

Since our freedom is not limited unless we are imprisoned. If we do not keep ourselves in check, the law may be forced to. This is a tough one, & requires self mastery. The enormity of freewill. Based on this we can make one hell of a mess, or we can spare ourselves the agony. :) don’t wreck your choice We’ve been given free will, God will never take it from us. Why do I feel so vulnerable with that?

Because I can really wreck things! This is where Faith comes in. What / Who do I place my trust in? My ability to sin / God’s ability to save, even before I mess up? Aha… I don’t need to have messed up before He saves me? No. Messing up is optional. I don’t always GET this. Do I trust that He WANTS to … or is it a case of ME not wanting to be saved? …from the pit? Do I LIKE the pit? No, but I like to be free to make the choice.

The CHOICE is yours, the choice is mine. Do not be afraid. We always get to choose. No questions asked. We have authority over our choices. There is no power struggle from God. He placed choice in our hands & the ball in OUR court. Believe the good news. This way, when we choose Good, it is real.

We have won a victory over death & destruction. smooth sailing God will not bar our way to hell, nor will He chase us into heaven’s gates.

He enlightens our minds so we may know good from evil, then stands back & allows us freedom of choice. He even helps us by Redeeming poor choice when we give it to Him to do so! But he will never impede our ability to choose a lie over truth. I feel Life really begun for me, then… when I chose His Way. I thought it was going to be boring!

It’s not what I feared, …it was Heaven! When I began to trust that His way lead to Life, :) My life became so much more interesting. It just seemed to sparkle! Looking back it’s as though my existence B.C. ( B4 Christ) was in dull tones of Grey, that suddenly burst into full bloom with dazzling hues as He entered my time & space with His Mercy & Majesty !

It was glorious! O the wonders that await in His Arms, where you smile much & Love exceedingly. The choice is ours. There is a way that leads to destruction & a way that leads to life. What’s YOUR CHOICE ?





*BEST OF DTB #73* "But this kind does not come out except by prayer and fasting"

Posted by John Benko - March 30th, 2011


HOME PAGE
Blogtalkradio Show
You Tube Channel
Twitter Page
E-MAIL US

We do not have an abortion facility in Amarillo. What we have is a bus. This bus takes pregnant women down to Lubbock every Thursday and brings them back again after their abortions. It’s a two hour trip down and an eternity back according to one woman who made that trip.
Her story inspired this:
Fasting Once a Week
for Life
My dear friend, Rozanne, will be praying and fasting every Wednesday in order to open the hearts of these mothers to the alternatives to abortion. I will be praying and fasting every Thursday to help heal the women who got on that bus because they felt they had no other choice.
Rozanne and I feel called to do this because we are Texans. Roe v. Wade was a Texas case. The first abortuary opened in Dallas. We Texans have a responsibility to this country for the wounds inflicted upon our sisters in the name of Choice. We are the state that has begun 40 Days for Life and we need to do even more. Will you join with two Texans in fasting and praying once a week for life? There are seven days in the week, pick any one.
Our fast is simple: bread and broth for the day with a big serving of compassionate prayer. If you can’t fast from food, fast from something else. Help us spread the word. Join us. We can end the need for abortion facilities by providing more than one choice.



To contact me: andychrism@yahoo.com

*BEST OF DTB #72* The Catholic Defender: Works VS Obedience

Posted by John Benko - March 27th, 2011

One of the most interesting debates between Catholics and Protestants is the understanding of faith and good works.

The “informed” Protestant will challenge a Catholic with some of St. Paul’s writings such as “A worker’s wage is credited not as a gift, but as something due. But when one does not work, yet believes in the one who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness apart from works: Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven and whose sins are covered. Blessed is the man whose sin the Lord does not record” (Romans 4:4-8).

The Catholic will respond back with James 2:24, “See how a person is justified by works and not by faith alone”.

Often times Philippians 2:12, “So then, my beloved, obedient as you have always been, not only when I am present but all the more now when I am absent, work out your salvation with fear and trembling” is presented by Catholics.

I think that what is happening is that both sides are simply shooting from a simple misunderstanding that Protestants are having about works.

Going back to Romans 4:4-8, what was St. Paul speaking too? The verse following Romans 4:8 says, “Does this blessedness apply only to the circumcised, or to the uncircumcised as well? Now we assert that faith was credited to Abraham as righteousness. Under what circumstances was it credited? Was he circumcised or not? He was not circumcised, but uncircumcised. And he received the sign of circumcision as a seal on the righteousness received through faith while he was uncircumcised”.

What is St. Paul talking about here?

The works of the law was a shadow to the Covenant Christ would eventually establish through the law of grace. St. Paul was an important figure at the Council of Jerusalem.

The main issue debated at the Council of Jerusalem concerned the Old Testament Law which included works of the law.

For St. Paul, he argued “For the law produces wrath; but where there is no law, neither is there violation” (Romans 4:15).

The works of the law could not save a person. This is exactly how Protestants view Catholic teachings on the Sacraments. They see the Sacraments as a product of works.

In truth, if Protestants understood correctly what St. Paul was addressing concerning the works of the law, there would be no argument. They would have no argument.

The Catholic Church made it’s ruling on the works of the law at the Council of Jerusalem. The law of grace took center stage. All Christians can agree to this understanding because of the importance of grace.

It is a free gift. However, for the Catholic, we must co-operate with God’s will in our lives. We must grow spiritually in our faith which demands faithfulness to God’s law. Not from the Old Testament, but God’s law from the light of the New Covenant. The new law of grace.
We must be obedient to God’s will. St. John brings this message home writing, “The way we may be sure that we know him is to keep his commandments. Whoever says, I know him, but does not keep his commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him” (1 John 2:3-4).

The real issue ultimately, goes back to authority. This age old problem between Catholics and Protestants always go back to the issue of authority. This includes obedience to the Church, faithfulness to the Church, cooperating with the Church working together in love with the graces dispensed by Christ through his Church.

Protestants contend that Jesus Christ established an invisible church, that there is no true church. That there are true Christians in every denomination.

The Protestants have redefined the meaning of St. Paul’s writing regarding works as Martin Luther included “alone” to his German translation of Paul’s letter to the Romans.

Luther knew full well that St. Paul never added the word alone anywhere in any of his letters. Only James speaks of “faith alone” and he is clear that salvation is not by faith alone.

Luther regarded the book of James as a “Gospel of straw”, that it had “no backbone”.

The Catholic position clearly stands, but it is important to understand that when Protestants talk about works, St. Paul is referring to the works of the law from a covenant that has been superseded.

Obviously, we are not saved by the works of the law because those works have been completed in Jesus Christ.

Jesus established a New Covenant giving us a new law based from grace that nobody can boast. The works that we do are a completion of faith.

We cannot take the free grace of God and the faith built upon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets, the Catholic Church, and live in vain.

We cannot bury our faith in the back yard and expect God’s grace to be fruitful in us. We must be obedient in faith working out our salvation utilizing the grace God gives us.

HOME PAGE
Blogtalkradio Show
You Tube Channel
Twitter Page
E-MAIL US


*BEST OF DTB #71* Purgatory- the show notes

Posted by John Benko - March 24th, 2011

These are the show notes for my debate with Dale McAlpine on the doctrine of purgatory. I invite you to listen to the show in conjunction with this article.

Here are my opening remarks;


The doctrine of purgatory is usually contested on 7 separate grounds.

The first ground is that it contradicts the finished work of Christ. Protestants will contend that purgatory casts aspersions on the sufficiency of Christ’s suffering and death. We contend, that they are confusing Christ’s Covenant Salvation with the false doctrine of imputed righteousness. (show notes- note 1).

Any Catholic would gladly concede that Christ’s sufferings at Calvary were sufficient to purchase the graces need to remit every sin. Nevertheless, Paul tells the Colossians and Romans that there is something lacking in those sufferings that is filled up by our sufferings through the ministry of the church. (show notes- note 2).

This is not an issue of insufficiency on Jesus’ part, it is insufficiency on our part if we fail to fulfill our part of the Covenant. Jesus covenant with us explicitly links our discipleship to following Him on the way of the cross. (note 3).

The second of the often raised objections is that Purgatory is a sort of ”back door” theology that provides an additional path to earning one’s way into heaven. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Catholics agree with most other denominations on three things:

1) That every soul will eventually end up in either heaven or hell
2) That the determination of that destiny will be made in our earthly life.
3) That a soul, after death, can do nothing for which it can earn merit for itself.

The assertion that purgatory is a second chance or “safety net” is just false. Purgatory is a place of temporal punishment and cleansing for souls that have already been saved from hell but are not yet clean enough for heaven.

The “safety net” accusation of protestants such as John McArthur is nothing but a straw man. We do not disagree that those who failed to choose Christ, of their own free will, will be lost. What we dispute is that the notion that those who failed to choose him perfectly will go straight to heaven. This is clearly disputed by Luke 12 and other scriptures. (note 4)

The third objection is that purgatory contradicts the mercy of God. This objection, again, contradicts Scripture.

The Bible does not treat all sin equal. If it did, the serial killer would be treated the same as the person trying to quit smoking. This notion is an affront to God’s goodness, His Justice and to basic common sense.
1 John Chapter 5 tells us that there are different degrees of sin and Luke 12 tells us that there are different punishments due to them. Only by ignoring these verses, and misquoting verses like Romans 3:10, can God be made into a monster who punishes everyone with eternal fire who commits even the smallest vice. It is only the notion that God requires absolute perfection from us, that makes imputed righteousness seem necessary, because none of us can meet that standard. This standard of absolute perfection is a protestant invention and is refuted by the clear words of Jesus in the parable of the talents (Matthew 25:14-30)
Further, Matthew 5 shows us that those who show mercy will be shown mercy and those who do not fully reconcile accounts with the accuser will be thrown in a prison until they have paid the last penny.

So, purgatory, far from violating God’s mercy, is the very expression of it. For, if not for purgatory, even the smallest sin would mean hell.
(note 5)

The fourth objection is that Purgatory is a Catholic invention.

Protestants often contend that Catholics invented the doctrine of purgatory but cannot agree on when this supposedly occurred. Many contend that it happened during the reign of Pope Gregory the Great between 590- 604. Some even contend that it was invented in the period of time between 1274 and 1563 in councils at Lyon, Florence and Trent. Whatever date they assign, their case is wholly untenable.

Purgatory, as a word, dates back to about the 12th century. However, the established belief of a place of temporal purging goes back all the way to the infancy of the church and even further.

Whether or not one agrees with the Catholic Church that II Maccabees is inspired scripture is irrelevant because no one can credibly deny that it is an accurate historical book from the Second century BC and, as such, proves the doctrine of a place of temporal punishment to be at least 700 years older than protestant claims. The practice of praying for the dead still exists in Judaism today in the Mourner’s Kaddish.
Contrary to my opponent’s assertion that Catholics invented purgatory, it is actually the protestant reformers who invented a Christianity that doesn’t hold to this doctrine. There are even proofs of the belief in purgatory in the very catacombs of the infant church. This too, is in the show notes.

In addition to catacomb writings indicated above, we provide historical defenses of purgatory in the show notes from The Acts of Paul and Thecla (160Ad), The Martyrdom of Perpetua and Felicity (202 AD),Tertullian (210), Cyprian (253), Lactantius (307), Cyril (350), Gregory of Nyssa (382), John Crysostom (402) and Augustine (411-421).

All of these writings predate the period of time were supposed to have invented purgatory.

In fact, it was not until the 16th century reformers that anyone even questioned the doctrine that it was proper to pray for the souls of the deceased. (note 6)

Objection 5 contends that praying for and/or to the dead is a pagan practice that violates the ban in set forth in verses such as Deuteronomy 18:9 that bans mediums or spiritists who commune with the dead.

Jesus made it very clear that the saints- even of His time on earth- are not dead but living. In fact, they are even more alive than we are. Further, asking the saints, or even the souls in purgatory, to pray for us is a simple recognition of the communion of saints that we see in verses such as Hebrews 12:1 and Revelation 5:8. (note 7)

Objection 6 claims that the doctrine of purgatory, or even of temporal punishment for sin, is not present is Scripture.

Scripture shows all of the elements that constitute the doctrine of purgatory- venial sins as opposed to mortal and the efficacy of both suffering and prayer for others, (note 8), temporal punishment for sin, and a place where this occurs, after death. (note 9) All of this exists in scripture.

In 1 Corinthians 3:15, Paul tells us that some will only be saved as through fire, though they themselves suffer. In Luke 12, Jesus contrast those who will be punished severely vs those who will be punished lightly. Again, these proof texts make no sense if this doctrine is false.

Finally, objection number 7 seeks to impugn the doctrine of purgatory because of the practice of selling indulgences during the dark ages and masses for the dead . In short, to imply that purgatory is nothing but a money maker. The accusation is that Catholics are attempting to sell the forgiveness of God. During this debate, I am not going to go into a broad discussion on the idea of indulgences. I will only say that Catholics concede the liturgical abuse that was the selling of indulgences but this, in no way, is selling the forgiveness of God, nor is it selling a license to indulge in sin, though the modern definition of the word does seem to imply this.

The selling of indulgences does not detract from their legitimate use and it certainly doesn’t detract from purgatory as a doctrine. Further, a Mass for the deceased nets the presiding Priest about $5. This is hardly going to make him rich. (note 10)
Now that I have outlined these 7 most common objections, let’s go a bit deeper.

For starters, belief in the doctrine of purgatory stands or falls on our understanding of Salvation. If one believes, as Catholics do, that God’s mercy must be reconciled with His justice in a way that demands we cooperate with His grace and work out our salvation with fear and trembling (Phillipians 2:12) then seeing purgatory as a logical consequence of that is not difficult.

On the other hand, if we belief that salvation is by Christ alone, that it is something He imputes to us, then the notion of purgatory would make very little sense.

My opponent is obviously going to be arguing from a standpoint that assumes the latter perspective to be true. My standpoint assumes that his standpoint is false. In the end, we are not debating substitutionary grace vs participatory grace today directly, but we are doing so indirectly. For the arguments I am presenting today are from scripture and history and I intend to prove that Christian and Jewish scripture and history and tradition have, from the very start held to a place of temporal suffering for sin apart from the eternal place of suffering- hell.

For Luther and protestantism, the Biblical references to a temporal prison where souls are purified as through fire is quite a threat to his new and novel notion of an imputed salvation through faith alone. So, his motivation to deconstruct this theology and cast aspersions on it’s foundation are certainly understood.

Nevertheless, the Gospels pronounce many times that we will all be repaid according to our works, and purgatory, for some, will be that consequence..



My friends, I hope these show notes will help you better understand the material covered in our debate. To that end, please allow us to expand on some of the thoughts presented in my opening statement in these show notes.



Note 1: Covenant vs Imputation

At the very heart of protestant misunderstanding of purgatory (and the larger issue of salvation) is that protestants see salvation as a substitutionary act of Christ alone, suffering and dying in our place. In this model, nothing is required of us but to accept His freely given salvation by a consent to faith.

This model is not Biblical .

First of all, the word Covenant appears in Scripture more than 160 times with almost 20 of them appearing in the New Testament. Of the most noteworthy are Luke 22:20 and Revelation 11:19-12:1 that show us that the Covenant is in a person and that person’s blood, namely Jesus Christ.

One cannot ignore what Covenant means. The word, itself, refutes the protestant understanding embodied in the five solas (Grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, by Scripture alone, for His glory alone).

cov·e·nant

covenant pronunciation/ˈkʌvənənt/ Show Spelled[kuhv-uh-nuhnt] Show IPA

–noun
1. an agreement, usually formal, between two or more persons to do or not do something specified.
2. Law . an incidental clause in such an agreement.
3. Ecclesiastical . a solemn agreement between the members of a church to act together in harmony with the precepts of the gospel.
4. ( initial capital letter ) History/Historical .
5.
Bible .
a.
the conditional promises made to humanity by god, as revealed in Scripture.
b.
the agreement between God and the ancient Israelites, in which God promised to protect them if they kept His law and were faithful to Him.
6.
Law .
a.
a formal agreement of legal validity, especially one under seal.
b.
an early English form of action in suits involving sealed contracts.
–verb (used without object)
8.
to enter into a covenant.
–verb (used with object)
9.
to promise by covenant; pledge.
10.
to stipulate.

A Covenant is an agreement requiring something from both parties. Protestants will often use the weak Jesus argument to suggest that if you must do anything, then your Jesus isn’t strong enough to save you. The truth is that the catholic Jesus is not a weak Jesus but a Sovereign Jesus and a Just Jesus

Protestants claim that salvation is a personal relationship with Jesus but any relationship with Jesus is on His terms, not on ours and anyone who says “I know Him” but doesn’t keep the commandments is a liar and the truth is not in him (1 John 2:4).

Protestants often misinterpret proof texts such as Romans 10:9 to mean that only a verbal and intellectual assent is needed for salvation but scripture clearly refutes such an interpretation;

Romans 2
Therefore you have no excuse, O man, whoever you are, when you judge another; for in passing judgment upon him you condemn yourself, because you, the judge, are doing the very same things. 2 We know that the judgment of God rightly falls upon those who do such things. 3 Do you suppose, O man, that when you judge those who do such things and yet do them yourself, you will escape the judgment of God? 4 Or do you presume upon the riches of his kindness and forbearance and patience? Do you not know that God’s kindness is meant to lead you to repentance? 5 But by your hard and impenitent heart you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath when God’s righteous judgment will be revealed. 6 For he will render to every man according to his works: 7 to those who by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immortality, he will give eternal life; 8 but for those who are factious and do not obey the truth, but obey wickedness, there will be wrath and fury.



Matthew 5

Seeing the crowds, he went up on the mountain, and when he sat down his disciples came to him. 2 And he opened his mouth and taught them, saying: 3 “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. 4 “Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted. 5 “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth. 6 “Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied. 7 “Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy. 8* “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God. 9 “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God. 10* “Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

11 “Blessed are you when men revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. 12Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so men persecuted the prophets who were before you.
13 “You are the salt of the earth; but if salt has lost its taste, how shall its saltness be restored? It is no longer good for anything except to be thrown out and trodden under foot by men.
14 “You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hid. 15 Nor do men light a lamp and put it under a bushel, but on a stand, and it gives light to all in the house. 16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven.
17 “Think not that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfil them. 18* For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the law until all is accomplished. 19* Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

James 2

8 If you really fulfil the royal law, according to the scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you do well. 9 But if you show partiality, you commit sin, and are convicted by the law as transgressors. 10 For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it. 11 For he who said, “Do not commit adultery,” said also, “Do not kill.” If you do not commit adultery but do kill, you have become a transgressor of the law. 12 So speak and so act as those who are to be judged under the law of liberty. 13 For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy; yet mercy triumphs over judgment.
14 What does it profit, my brethren, if a man says he has faith but has not works? Can his faith save him? 15 If a brother or sister is ill-clad and in lack of daily food, 16 and one of you says to them, “Go in peace, be warmed and filled,” without giving them the things needed for the body, what does it profit? 17 So faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead.
18 But some one will say, “You have faith and I have works.” Show me your faith apart from your works, and I by my works will show you my faith. 19 You believe that God is one; you do well. Even the demons believe–and shudder. 20 Do you want to be shown, you shallow man, that faith apart from works is barren? 21* Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he offered his son Isaac upon the altar? 22 You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by works, 23* and the scripture was fulfilled which says, “Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness”; and he was called the friend of God. 24 You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone. 25* And in the same way was not also Rahab the harlot justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out another way? 26 For as the body apart from the spirit is dead, so faith apart from works is dead.

These texts clearly show that salvation is not merely an issue of what Christ has done for us but of what we must do in return. that is a covenant relationship. The doctrine of imputed righteousness comes almost solely from a mistranslation of the King James version of the Bible of
verses such as James 2:23. Imputed righteousness is not Biblical because God cannot lie. God cannot simply declare clean that which is unclean, He must make clean that which is unclean. For no unclean thing can enter heaven. (Revelation 21:27). God makes us clean when we participate with His free gift of grace.



Note 2: What is lacking in the afflictions of Christ?


No protestant proponent of imputation theology can answer the challenge put forth by these two verses from Saint Paul to the Colossians;

Colossians 1

24 Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I complete what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church, 25 of which I became a minister according to the divine office which was given to me for you, to make the word of God fully known,

In fact, these two verses of scripture demolish the entire protestant salvation model of faith alone. Let’s review;

1) Paul is rejoicing in his own sufferings as beneficial to others,
2) Paul’s sufferings complete something that cannot be completed by Christ’s sufferings alone.
3) That completion is of benefit to the entire church through Paul’s divine office.
4) Paul’s divine office is by God, for us, for the purpose of making God known to us.

Christ alone refuted. Personal relationship refuted. Faith alone refuted. Scripture alone refuted.

Christ’s sufferings do not prevent our sufferings, they give them value.

To see this, we must view scripture in context. We can simply quote Romans 5:1-2;

Therefore, since we are justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. 2 Through him we have obtained access to this grace in which we stand, and we rejoice in our hope of sharing the glory of God.

and claim that salvation is by “faith alone”, or we can be honest and read the rest of this citation

3 More than that, we rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, 4 and endurance produces character, and character produces hope, 5 and hope does not disappoint us, because God’s love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit which has been given to us.

Faith must be tested by fire. anyone can express faith in the sunshine. can your faith endure in the storm, that it be proved?



Note 3: Take up thy cross


Matthew 16
24 Then Jesus told his disciples, “If any man would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. 25 For whoever would save his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. 26 For what will it profit a man, if he gains the whole world and forfeits his life? Or what shall a man give in return for his life?

Matthew 10

34 “Do not think that I have come to bring peace on earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35 For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; 36 and a man’s foes will be those of his own household. 37 He who loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and he who loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me; 38 and he who does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. 39 He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for my sake will find it.

Mark 8

34* And he called to him the multitude with his disciples, and said to them, “If any man would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. 35* For whoever would save his life will lose it; and whoever loses his life for my sake and the gospel’s will save it. 36 For what does it profit a man, to gain the whole world and forfeit his life? 37 For what can a man give in return for his life? 38* For whoever is ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him will the Son of man also be ashamed, when he comes in the glory of his Father with the holy angels.”

Luke 9

23* And he said to all, “If any man would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me. 24* For whoever would save his life will lose it; and whoever loses his life for my sake, he will save it. 25 For what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world and loses or forfeits himself? 26* For whoever is ashamed of me and of my words, of him will the Son of man be ashamed when he comes in his glory and the glory of the Father and of the holy angels. 27* But I tell you truly, there are some standing here who will not taste death before they see the kingdom of God.”


Luke 14
25 Now great multitudes accompanied him; and he turned and said to them, 26* “If any one comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple. 27* Whoever does not bear his own cross and come after me, cannot be my disciple. 28 For which of you, desiring to build a tower, does not first sit down and count the cost, whether he has enough to complete it? 29 Otherwise, when he has laid a foundation, and is not able to finish, all who see it begin to mock him, 30 saying, ‘This man began to build, and was not able to finish.’ 31 Or what king, going to encounter another king in war, will not sit down first and take counsel whether he is able with ten thousand to meet him who comes against him with twenty thousand? 32 And if not, while the other is yet a great way off, he sends an embassy and asks terms of peace. 33* So therefore, whoever of you does not renounce all that he has cannot be my disciple.


Note 4: A light beating?

In the 12th chapter of Luke’s gospel, Jesus talks about what will happen when “The Master” (Himself) returns. He says something that makes no sense whatsoever if you follow protestant theology;

42 And the Lord said, “Who then is the faithful and wise steward, whom his master will set over his household, to give them their portion of food at the proper time? 43 Blessed is that servant whom his master when he comes will find so doing. 44 Truly, I say to you, he will set him over all his possessions. 45 But if that servant says to himself, ‘My master is delayed in coming,’ and begins to beat the menservants and the maidservants, and to eat and drink and get drunk, 46 the master of that servant will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he does not know, and will punish him, and put him with the unfaithful. 47 And that servant who knew his master’s will, but did not make ready or act according to his will, shall receive a severe beating. 48 But he who did not know, and did what deserved a beating, shall receive a light beating. Every one to whom much is given, of him will much be required; and of him to whom men commit much they will demand the more.

This is just more proof that protestant salvation theology just does not add up. It is simply impossible to reconcile the concept of a light beating with the eternal horror that is hell. This passage of scripture shows very clearly that each person will be rewarded or punished according to their own personal account and that some, who escape the eternal punishments of hell, will suffer the temporal pains of purgatory.



Note 5: Not released until you pay?


Luke 12

57 “And why do you not judge for yourselves what is right? 58 As you go with your accuser before the magistrate, make an effort to settle with him on the way, lest he drag you to the judge, and the judge hand you over to the officer, and the officer put you in prison. 59 I tell you, you will never get out till you have paid the very last copper.”

This cannot refer to hell. If it did, Jesus would make no pretense that you would ever be released.



Note 6: The early church believed in the doctrine of purgatory.


II Maccabees 12
39 On the next day, as by that time it had become necessary, Judas and his men went to take up the bodies of the fallen and to bring them back to lie with their kinsmen in the sepulchres of their fathers. 40 Then under the tunic of every one of the dead they found sacred tokens of the idols of Jamnia, which the law forbids the Jews to wear. And it became clear to all that this was why these men had fallen. 41 So they all blessed the ways of the Lord, the righteous Judge, who reveals the things that are hidden; 42 and they turned to prayer, beseeching that the sin which had been committed might be wholly blotted out. And the noble Judas exhorted the people to keep themselves free from sin, for they had seen with their own eyes what had happened because of the sin of those who had fallen. 43 He also took up a collection, man by man, to the amount of two thousand drachmas of silver, and sent it to Jerusalem to provide for a sin offering. In doing this he acted very well and honorably, taking account of the resurrection. 44 For if he were not expecting that those who had fallen would rise again, it would have been superfluous and foolish to pray for the dead. 45 But if he was looking to the splendid reward that is laid up for those who fall asleep in godliness, it was a holy and pious thought. 46 Therefore he made atonement for the dead, that they might be delivered from their sin.

That the Christian Church,from it’s very earliest days, believed in a place of temporal punishment after death is a historical fact that cannot be credibly disputed. The oldest prayers for the dead inscribed on the walls of the catacombs been positively dated to 71 AD,with many others dated from that time, forward to the 5th century.

Further, there are many other writings of the early church supporting this doctrine;

The Acts of Paul and Thecla

“And after the exhibition, Tryphaena again received her [Thecla]. For her daughter Falconilla had died, and said to her in a dream: ‘Mother, you shall have this stranger Thecla in my place, in order that she may pray concerning me, and that I may be transferred to the place of the righteous’” (Acts of Paul and Thecla [A.D. 160]).

Abercius

“The citizen of a prominent city, I erected this while I lived, that I might have a resting place for my body. Abercius is my name, a disciple of the chaste Shepherd who feeds his sheep on the mountains and in the fields, who has great eyes surveying everywhere, who taught me the faithful writings of life. Standing by, I, Abercius, ordered this to be inscribed: Truly, I was in my seventy-second year. May everyone who is in accord with this and who understands it pray for Abercius” (Epitaph of Abercius [A.D. 190]).

The Martyrdom of Perpetua and Felicity

“[T]hat very night, this was shown to me in a vision: I [Perpetua] saw Dinocrates going out from a gloomy place, where also there were several others, and he was parched and very thirsty, with a filthy countenance and pallid color, and the wound on his face which he had when he died. This Dinocrates had been my brother after the flesh, seven years of age, who died miserably with disease. . . . For him I had made my prayer, and between him and me there was a large interval, so that neither of us could approach to the other . . . and [I] knew that my brother was in suffering. But I trusted that my prayer would bring help to his suffering; and I prayed for him every day until we passed over into the prison of the camp, for we were to fight in the camp-show. Then . . . I made my prayer for my brother day and night, groaning and weeping that he might be granted to me. Then, on the day on which we remained in fetters, this was shown to me: I saw that the place which I had formerly observed to be in gloom was now bright; and Dinocrates, with a clean body well clad, was finding refreshment. . . . [And] he went away from the water to play joyously, after the manner of children, and I awoke. Then I understood that he was translated from the place of punishment” (The Martyrdom of Perpetua and Felicity 2:3–4 [A.D. 202]).

Tertullian

“We offer sacrifices for the dead on their birthday anniversaries [the date of death—birth into eternal life]” (The Crown 3:3 [A.D. 211]).

“A woman, after the death of her husband . . . prays for his soul and asks that he may, while waiting, find rest; and that he may share in the first resurrection. And each year, on the anniversary of his death, she offers the sacrifice” (Monogamy 10:1–2 [A.D. 216]).

Cyprian of Carthage

“The strength of the truly believing remains unshaken; and with those who fear and love God with their whole heart, their integrity continues steady and strong. For to adulterers even a time of repentance is granted by us, and peace [i.e., reconciliation] is given. Yet virginity is not therefore deficient in the Church, nor does the glorious design of continence languish through the sins of others. The Church, crowned with so many virgins, flourishes; and chastity and modesty preserve the tenor of their glory. Nor is the vigor of continence broken down because repentance and pardon are facilitated to the adulterer. It is one thing to stand for pardon, another thing to attain to glory; it is one thing, when cast into prison, not to go out thence until one has paid the uttermost farthing; another thing at once to receive the wages of faith and courage. It is one thing, tortured by long suffering for sins, to be cleansed and long purged by fire; another to have purged all sins by suffering. It is one thing, in fine, to be in suspense till the sentence of God at the day of judgment; another to be at once crowned by the Lord” (Letters 51[55]:20 [A.D. 253]).

Cyril of Jerusalem

“Then we make mention also of those who have already fallen asleep: first, the patriarchs, prophets, apostles, and martyrs, that through their prayers and supplications God would receive our petition; next, we make mention also of the holy fathers and bishops who have already fallen asleep, and, to put it simply, of all among us who have already fallen asleep, for we believe that it will be of very great benefit to the souls of those for whom the petition is carried up, while this holy and most solemn sacrifice is laid out” (Catechetical Lectures 23:5:9 [A.D. 350]).

Gregory of Nyssa

“If a man distinguish in himself what is peculiarly human from that which is irrational, and if he be on the watch for a life of greater urbanity for himself, in this present life he will purify himself of any evil contracted, overcoming the irrational by reason. If he has inclined to the irrational pressure of the passions, using for the passions the cooperating hide of things irrational, he may afterward in a quite different manner be very much interested in what is better, when, after his departure out of the body, he gains knowledge of the difference between virtue and vice and finds that he is not able to partake of divinity until he has been purged of the filthy contagion in his soul by the purifying fire” (Sermon on the Dead [A.D. 382]).

John Chrysostom

“Let us help and commemorate them. If Job’s sons were purified by their father’s sacrifice [Job 1:5], why would we doubt that our offerings for the dead bring them some consolation? Let us not hesitate to help those who have died and to offer our prayers for them” (Homilies on First Corinthians 41:5 [A.D. 392]).

“Weep for those who die in their wealth and who with all their wealth prepared no consolation for their own souls, who had the power to wash away their sins and did not will to do it. Let us weep for them, let us assist them to the extent of our ability, let us think of some assistance for them, small as it may be, yet let us somehow assist them. But how, and in what way? By praying for them and by entreating others to pray for them, by constantly giving alms to the poor on their behalf. Not in vain was it decreed by the apostles that in the awesome mysteries remembrance should be made of the departed. They knew that here there was much gain for them, much benefit. When the entire people stands with hands uplifted, a priestly assembly, and that awesome sacrificial Victim is laid out, how, when we are calling upon God, should we not succeed in their defense? But this is done for those who have departed in the faith, while even the catechumens are not reckoned as worthy of this consolation, but are deprived of every means of assistance except one. And what is that? We may give alms to the poor on their behalf” (Homilies on Philippians 3:9–10 [A.D. 402]).

Augustine

“There is an ecclesiastical discipline, as the faithful know, when the names of the martyrs are read aloud in that place at the altar of God, where prayer is not offered for them. Prayer, however, is offered for other dead who are remembered. It is wrong to pray for a martyr, to whose prayers we ought ourselves be commended” (Sermons 159:1 [A.D. 411]).

“But by the prayers of the holy Church, and by the salvific sacrifice, and by the alms which are given for their spirits, there is no doubt that the dead are aided, that the Lord might deal more mercifully with them than their sins would deserve. The whole Church observes this practice which was handed down by the Fathers: that it prays for those who have died in the communion of the Body and Blood of Christ, when they are commemorated in their own place in the sacrifice itself; and the sacrifice is offered also in memory of them, on their behalf. If, then, works of mercy are celebrated for the sake of those who are being remembered, who would hesitate to recommend them, on whose behalf prayers to God are not offered in vain? It is not at all to be doubted that such prayers are of profit to the dead; but for such of them as lived before their death in a way that makes it possible for these things to be useful to them after death” (ibid., 172:2).

“Temporal punishments are suffered by some in this life only, by some after death, by some both here and hereafter, but all of them before that last and strictest judgment. But not all who suffer temporal punishments after death will come to eternal punishments, which are to follow after that judgment” (The City of God 21:13 [A.D. 419]).

“That there should be some fire even after this life is not incredible, and it can be inquired into and either be discovered or left hidden whether some of the faithful may be saved, some more slowly and some more quickly in the greater or lesser degree in which they loved the good things that perish, through a certain purgatorial fire” (Handbook on Faith, Hope, and Charity 18:69 [A.D. 421]).

“The time which interposes between the death of a man and the final resurrection holds souls in hidden retreats, accordingly as each is deserving of rest or of hardship, in view of what it merited when it was living in the flesh. Nor can it be denied that the souls of the dead find relief through the piety of their friends and relatives who are still alive, when the Sacrifice of the Mediator [Mass] is offered for them, or when alms are given in the Church. But these things are of profit to those who, when they were alive, merited that they might afterward be able to be helped by these things. There is a certain manner of living, neither so good that there is no need of these helps after death, nor yet so wicked that these helps are of no avail after death” (ibid., 29:109).

[source: Catholic Answers]


Note 7: The great cloud of witnesses

Matthew 22

29 But Jesus answered them, “You are wrong, because you know neither the scriptures nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels * in heaven. 31 And as for the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was said to you by God, 32* ‘I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? He is not God of the dead, but of the living.” 33* And when the crowd heard it, they were astonished at his teaching.

Hebrews 12

Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us also lay aside every weight, and sin which clings so closely, and let us run with perseverance the race that is set before us,

Revelation 5

8 And when he had taken the scroll, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb, each holding a harp, and with golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints;


Note 8: Elements of the purgatory doctrine in scripture

1John 5
16 If any one sees his brother committing what is not a mortal sin, he will ask, and God will give him life for those whose sin is not mortal. There is sin which is mortal; I do not say that one is to pray for that. 17 All wrongdoing is sin, but there is sin which is not mortal.

Since the Catholic concept of both mortal and venial sin is proved from Scripture, so both the concepts of eternal and temporal punishment are shown as well, because, as we said before, Jesus promised that each man will be repaid according to his deeds.

Further, this proof text also shows that a person can be loosed from the consequences of non-mortal sins, by the prayers of another person. This ratifies the exact claim made in II Maccabees chapter 12.


Note 9: The temporal prison

Those who die saved from hell, but with their entrance to heaven incomplete, must spend time in a temporal place of imprisonment. Jesus and Peter both alluded to this place;

Jesus:

Matthew 5
21* “You have heard that it was said to the men of old, ‘You shall not kill; and whoever kills shall be liable to judgment.’ 22 But I say to you that every one who is angry with his brother * shall be liable to judgment; whoever insults * his brother shall be liable to the council, and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ shall be liable to the hell * of fire. 23 So if you are offering your gift at the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24 leave your gift there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift. 25* Make friends quickly with your accuser, while you are going with him to court, lest your accuser hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the guard, and you be put in prison; 26 truly, I say to you, you will never get out till you have paid the last penny.

Peter:
1 Peter 3

18 For Christ also died * for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit; 19 in which he went and preached to the spirits in prison, 20* who formerly did not obey, when God’s patience waited in the days of Noah, during the building of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were saved through water.
These verses make a complete mockery of Luther’s doctrine of ‘faith alone’ -and yet- here they are straight from the pages of Holy Scripture. The reason is clear- Salvation, as James 2:24 makes woefully clear, is not by Faith alone and all men, as Romans 2:6 shows will receive the just reward or punishment for their works.
The doctrine of purgatory is a necessary and unmistakable consequence of Scripture and Scripture makes it very clear that some will only be saved as through fire. 1 Corinthians 3

12 Now if any one builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw– 13 each man’s work will become manifest; for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. 14 If the work which any man has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward. 15 If any man’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss, though he himself will be saved, but only as through fire.


Note 10: The stipend and the matter of indulgences. A source of wealth for the Church?

A Stipend for a funeral mass is voluntary and will usually net the Priest around $5. He is entitled to one such stipend a day. Hardly a big money maker for the church.

As for the matter of indulgences, they fall under the church’s power to bind and loose as enunciated is scripture (Matthew 16:19, 18:18).

The term Indulgences falls unfortunate victim to the modern English definition of Indulge.
Of course, in our modern lexicon, To indulge means to give into one’s own will and the connotation is often to give in to a sinful desire.

Some suspect that, knowing this, Catholics are being willfully dishonest or deceptive in representing what an Indulgence is. It would be very easy to conclude, given the modern definition, to conclude that an Indulgence is a license to commit….to indulge in…sin.

Though this mistaken interpretation is understandable, it most definitely is not correct.In fact, it is precisely the misunderstanding of just what an indulgence is that has led to the modern (and historically incorrect) definition.

The word Indulgence comes from the Latin indulgeo which is a word meaning to be kind or merciful.

Mercy can only be granted when it is sincerely sought by a penitent heart. To commit a sin, believing in advance that it is forgiven, is to commit the sin of presumption (Romans 2:4).
The concept of Indulgences presupposes no such thing. No one can give someone permission to sin and no one can presume forgiveness for someone who has sinned, lest they repent with sincerity.

An Indulgence does neither of these things.

True, to believe in the concept of Indulgences, you must be predisposed to a belief in the doctrine of purgatory.That being said, if you are to reject the concept of Indulgences, at least reject what they are and not what someone has falsely claimed them to be.

It has been alleged that when Indulgences were sold during the middle ages, this amounted to selling the forgiveness of God. That is a bit of a reach on the part of our detractors.

An Indulgence, as the true definition indicates, is a remittance of some or all of the punishment due sin. It is a reduction of the time a soul would have to spend in prison, so to speak.

There are two kinds of Indulgences; Partial and Plenary. Indulgences are usually given for some charitable work and are perfectly consistent with the principle that love covers a multitude of sins. (1 Peter 4:8)



Note 11: James 2:14-26



14 What does it profit, my brethren, if a man says he has faith but has not works? Can his faith save him? 15 If a brother or sister is ill-clad and in lack of daily food, 16 and one of you says to them, “Go in peace, be warmed and filled,” without giving them the things needed for the body, what does it profit? 17 So faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead.
18 But some one will say, “You have faith and I have works.” Show me your faith apart from your works, and I by my works will show you my faith. 19 You believe that God is one; you do well. Even the demons believe–and shudder. 20 Do you want to be shown, you shallow man, that faith apart from works is barren? 21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he offered his son Isaac upon the altar? 22 You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by works, 23* and the scripture was fulfilled which says, “Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness”; and he was called the friend of God. 24 You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone. 25 And in the same way was not also Rahab the harlot justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out another way? 26 For as the body apart from the spirit is dead, so faith apart from works is dead.



Note 12: The mad man that was Martin Luther


That Martin Luther, the founder of protestantism was a vulgar, misogynistic, anti-Semitic mad man almost goes without saying Here is one link to some of his mad ravings, including wanting to throw the Epistle of James into the stove.

Note 13: For by Grace you have been saved


Calvinists assert that salvation is by faith alone and that works are no component of it whatsoever. There are perhaps a dozen or so scriptures that Calvinists will use to support this contention. Among their favorites is Ephesians 2:8-9;

2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not from you; it is the gift of God; 2:9 it is not from works, so no one may boast.

At face value, Calvinists make these verses seem to support exactly what they claim. How? By wrenching the passage from it’s context and redefining the key words; Grace, faith and works.

First, let’s examine the context;

2:1 You were dead in your transgressions and sin
2:2 in which you once lived following the age of this world, * following the ruler of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the disobedient.
2:3 All of us once lived among them in the desires of our flesh, following the wishes of the flesh and the impulses, and we were by nature children of wrath, like the rest.
2:4 But God, who is rich in mercy, because of the great love he had for us,
2:5 even when we were dead in our transgressions, brought us to life with Christ * (by grace you have been saved),
2:6 raised us up with him, and seated us with him in the heavens in Christ Jesus,
2:7 that in the ages to come he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in his kindness to us in Christ Jesus.
2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not from you; it is the gift of God;
2:9 it is not from works, so no one may boast.
2:10 For we are his handiwork, created in Christ Jesus for the good works that God has prepared in advance, that we should live in them.

The context is key. Let’s work through it and I will explain how Calvinists actually define the words differently, to their own detriment.

2:1 You were dead in your transgressions and sin

That is, by your own works/deeds. Your choice to act in disobedience to God.


2:2 in which you once lived following the age of this world, following the ruler of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the disobedient.
2:3 All of us once lived among them in the desires of our flesh, following the wishes of the flesh and the impulses, and we were by nature children of wrath, like the rest.

So, we used our own free will (a concept rejected by Calvinists) to live according to our own selfish desires.


2:4 But God, who is rich in mercy, because of the great love he had for us,

Mercy? What need is there for mercy if we were not justly condemned? and how could we be justly condemned if we were not culpable for our choices? and how can we be culpable for our choices if we did not have the ability to choose to make them or avoid making them?

If we are to be condemned for our wrong choices, does this not presuppose a natural ability to make the right choices?

This is where the Calvinist doctrine of total depravity comes apart at the seams. This doctrine suggests that man is totally depraved, incapable of any good thing. There is no difference between a Mother Theresa and an Adolph Hitler. No distinction between Ghandi and Nero. Curse your own lying eyes for suggesting otherwise. Unless you have formally accepted Christ as your Savior, you are evil through and through, irredeemable, indistinguishable from Hitler.

The view is so abberant that it is borderline cult theology. Certainly sin has deformed us and alienated us from God. However, total depravity theology makes us all little hitlers, incapable of anything but evil. Actually. on second thought, Orthodox Christianity demands the belief that even Hitler could have repented…even Judas!

Orthodox Christianity allows for the belief of only one totally depraved person; Anti-Christ. In fact, the very thought of a human being with zero contrition, zero empathy, zero compassion, zero genoursity, and zero love should be enough to make your skin crawl. This is what makes the idea of Anti-Christ so frightening.

The doctrine of Total depravity juxtaposes those traits on every unsaved person.

The assertion is absurd on it’s face and turns the narrative of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10) on it’s ear. This is to say nothing of the fact that human beings, with simple observation, can see how ludicrous this doctrine is. All of you, in your life, have seen good and bad in every station of life.

Yes, all human beings have the capacity to choose bad but all, likewise, have the capacity to choose good. Only the damned lack this capacity. If man were totally depraved, he could not confess his sins, repent and choose Christ.

Catholic theology recognizes, in each person, both the light of God and the concupiscence of the flesh. Your salvation is decided by which of those two opposing forces becomes your master.

Remember, we are created in the image and likeness of God, not Satan.

So, tell me, Calvinists, how do you evangelize to a totally depraved person? Imagine trying to get a demon to accept Christ. There is a difference between an unsaved person and an unsavable person. A person who is totally depraved cannot feel remorse for he is so completely sociopathic as to worship himself.

2:6 raised us up with him, and seated us with him in the heavens in Christ Jesus,
2:7 that in the ages to come he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in his kindness to us in Christ Jesus.

2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not from you; it is the gift of God;
2:9 it is not from works, so no one may boast.
2:10 For we are his handiwork, created in Christ Jesus for the good works that God has prepared in advance, that we should live in them.
Verses 2, 7 and 10 are so important in providing context and Paul is saying so much more here than our Calvinist friends suggest. The whole meaning of these verses can only be determined by how these words and phrases are defined. Catholics define them correctly, Calvinists do not.

First, Grace. A Calvinist offers that Grace means only unmerited favor. They offer that Grace is nothing more than God’s disposition to save us- his kindness, if you will. Catholics offer that the Grace described here is something much more and misunderstanding that means misunderstanding the whole passage.

Grace is a thing, not a disposition to give a thing. Otherwise, verse 2:7 would literally be saying;
…..he might show the immeasurable riches of his kindness in his kindness…..

V7 clearly tells us that Grace is something given to us according to His kindness. It is not the kindness, itself. Grace is something we receive from God. Something that dwells inside us and, in which we are able to stand.

JN 1:16 From his fullness we have all received, grace in place of grace,

JN 1:17 because while the law was given through Moses, grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.

ACTS 6:8 Now Stephen, filled with grace and power, was working great wonders and signs among the people.

ACTS 11:23 When he arrived and saw the grace of God, he rejoiced and encouraged them all to remain faithful to the Lord in firmness of heart,

ACTS 13:43 After the congregation had dispersed, many Jews and worshipers who were converts to Judaism followed Paul and Barnabas, who spoke to them and urged them to remain faithful to the grace of God.

ACTS 15:11 On the contrary, we believe that we are saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, in the same way as they.”

EPH 1:7 In him we have redemption by his blood, the forgiveness of transgressions, in accord with the riches of his grace

EPH 2:5 even when we were dead in our transgressions, brought us to life with Christ (by grace you have been saved),

EPH 2:7 that in the ages to come he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in his kindness to us in Christ Jesus.

EPH 2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not from you; it is the gift of God;

EPH 3:2 if, as I suppose, you have heard of the stewardship of God’s grace that was given to me for your benefit,

EPH 3:7 Of this I became a minister by the gift of God’s grace that was granted me in accord with the exercise of his power.

EPH 3:8 To me, the very least of all the holy ones, this grace was given, to preach to the Gentiles the inscrutable riches of Christ,

EPH 4:7 But grace was given to each of us according to the measure of Christ’s gift.

EPH 4:29 No foul language should come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for needed edification, that it may impart grace to those who hear.

2:8 For by grace you have been saved

For by Grace…. Grace is what has saved you. So what is Grace? How does it save you? Grace is a supernatural substance, given to us by God. It Sanctifies us and removes sin and makes us stronger. In short, it makes us able to grow in holiness- something we cannot do of our own effort.

through faith,
Faith is the means by which you have received the Grace. Read it again. BY Grace, THROUGH faith. What is Faith? Is it just Verbal assent? This is what Calvinists say. However, you will see that that view does not hold up.

Now pay close attention…
and this is not from you; it is the gift of God;
2:9 it is not from works, so no one may boast.



Closing remarks

I am hopeful that those who listened to today’s debate found it entertaining and informative. My strong suspicion is that there are many who came in predisposed to a viewpoint and left, still convinced of the same view point.

Nevertheless, I am convinced that those who did come, firm in a viewpoint, and left, less so, moved in our direction.

The leaders, on the other side of this theological divide, want very much for you to believe that the doctrine of purgatory was created out of whole cloth by the Catholics of the middle ages, for some nefarious purpose. It is my contention that the opposite is true. It is the first protestants who invented the rejection of purgatory for their own ends.

After listening to this debate, you must now have at least some doubts about the protestant claims that the Catholics created this doctrine out of nothing. You must have at least a suspicion that the Catholics just might possibly have something here.

It does not matter that this doubt may be but a flicker, as on a match stick. A flicker can be fanned into a fire and a fire into a towering inferno. Many Catholic conversions have started from such a small spark.

You have to be at least admitting that the Protestant reformers did indeed have a strong motive for dismissing this doctrine, that goes beyond simple Biblical exegesis.

It is this motive that I will be focusing on during these closing remarks and you now have a moral obligation to investigate if what I say is true or not.

I have already shown you- in the case of Indulgences- how redefining a word changes the understanding of the concept that word is meant to ennunciate. I would argue to you, my friends, that protestantism has attempted to redefine the words faith and belief and how that draws a straight line back to their rejection of purgatory.

Covenant Faith and Belief are fused with action in the same way that fire is fused with heat. True, you can have heat without fire but you cannot have fire without heat. In the same way, you can have the faithless works condemned by Paul and you can have the work-less faith condemned by James but both of these constitute a false faith. True faith is started by assent and completed by action.

Romans 10:9 does tell us that if we “confess with our mouths and believe in our hearts” then we will be saved but, in reading this, some fatal errors.

A true exegetical examination of this passage indicates that this denotes someone making a confession of faith to the truths revealed to us. Further, it reveals, not just a mere professed belief in God but a complete submission to His lordship. That is true faith, that is saving faith.

The term translated to believe in your heart is pisteusēs and denotes believing in, trusting in and leaning on. This is what separates how protestants define belief and how Catholics define it.
Even the demons believe Christ is Lord and they shudder (James 2).

Simply accepting as true what God has done is not faith but Intellectual assent. Confessing this with your mouth is not faith but Verbal assent. Although Intellectual assent is the beginning of faith and Verbal assent is the pronouncement of faith, works are the completion and perfection of faith. Therefore, faith is shown by works, completed by works, perfected by works and active with works. Therefore, it is dead without works. My protestant brothers and sisters should take pause in the fact that the only scripture that exists containing the term faith alone is one that explicitly refutes this doctrine. Faith alone, in this context is referring exactly to Intellectual and Verbal assent that dies without the action that completes it as true saving faith.

I ask my protest brothers and sisters to truly read what James has to say in the 2nd chapter of his epistle, verses 14-26. show notes note 11 . Ponder especially the question he poses What does it profit, my brethren, if a man says he has faith but has not works? Can his faith save him? It certainly can not.

After you have pondered these things, ponder why Martin Luther, the founder of Protestantism, proponent of Sola Fide and reject-or of Purgatory, said, of the Epistle of James, that he would like to throw Jimmy into the stove and that the Epistle of James was probably written by some Jew who had heard of Christians but never actually encountered one. These quotes are well documented and can easily be found in an online search. We provide one link to these and other spurious Luther quotes in the show notes Note 12 .

It is not my intention, in these remarks to do a hack job on martin Luther and it is not within the scope of this debate to refute the doctrine of Sola Fide.

Yet, here I am, debating directly, the doctrine of purgatory as a measure of God’s divine Justice which my opponent deems as anti-Biblical. So, I must point out that my opponent follows the tradition of a man who removed 7 books from the canon of Scripture on dubious grounds and tried to remove James and the Book of Revelation as well. These are historical facts that cannot be plausibly denied.

What Luther missed is that salvation does not consist in declaring Christ Lord of your life but in making Him Lord of your life. The Bible says in 1 John, chapter 2, that he who says I know Him and keeps not His commandments is a liar and the truth is not in Him. If you do not know him, you cannot obey Him and if you cannot obey Him, He cannot save you. Jesus cannot declare the unjust person justified, Jesus must make the unjust person justified. You must become a new creation. (2 Corinthians 5:17)

How does this tie into purgatory? It’s very simple.

The protestant notion of sanctification and justification is expressed by Luther’s rather crude analogy of a snow covered pile of dung.

As Protestant RC Sproul puts it;


For Rome, God both makes just and declares just. For Protestants God both makes just and declares just — but not in the same way. For Rome the declaration of justice follows the making inwardly just of the regenerate sinner. For the Reformation the declaration of justice follows the imputation of Christ’s righteousness to the regenerated sinner.

The protestant model is false. In Paul’s letter to the Galatians, he declares “be not deceived, God is not mocked”. Every sin, at some level, is a rejection of God that calls for His Divine Justice. Grace does not cover the sinner externally, it changes him internally but only if he, through faith, cooperates with it. You cannot serve two masters.

What the Bible says of grace, clearly agrees with the Catholic understanding. Note 13

If Actual Grace, as we assert, enables the sinner to conquer his vices and Sanctifying grace, as we assert, cleanses the sinful soul, then the whole Jesus did it all for me argument collapses under it’s own weight. You choose to serve Christ, by his grace, and of your own free will and are rewarded or you choose to sin against Christ, rejecting His grace, of your own will and are punished.

It is your choice.

Deuteronomy

Chapter 30

19 I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that I have set before you life and death , blessing and curse; therefore choose life, that you and your descendants may live,

The notion that salvation is substitutionary is what makes purgatory seem null. But salvation is not substitutionary and the Bible tells us very clearly that each man will be repaid according to his deeds. Some will go straight to heaven, some will receive lessor punishments and some will, unfortunately, receive the horrible sentence of eternal hell.

My opponent asserts that all sin is equal and that all souls, upon death, will go straight to heaven or straight to hell but that does not agree with scripture, it does not agree with what the church has believed since it’s foundation, it does not agree with common sense and it does not agree with the perfect Justice of our Lord who searches every heart and measures good against bad, struggling sinner against unrepentant sinner.

My opponent cannot adequately explain why one sin is mortal and one is not, as I have shown. He cannot explain how one sinner receives a light beating while another receives a severe beating, as I have shown. He cannot explain, outside of heaven and hell what prison our Lord went to after death, as I have shown. He cannot explain where the souls who rose from the grave rose from when Our Lord died upon that Cross. He cannot explain how some sinners are saved as through fire. Finally, he cannot explain why history is not kind to his assertion that the early church rejected this doctrine.

In fact, at the end of the day, my opponent’s entire case rests with the conclusions and assertions of an unquestionably sinful man who actually claimed that a man could commit adultery a hundred times a day and as many murders with no affect on his salvation. A man who called the epistle of James an epistle of straw and the Book of Revelation a book of riddles.
At the end of the day, however, I am not asking you to form your conclusion based on the character of Luther alone, nor on the error of his conclusions, nor on the lack of historical support for his claims, nor on the numerous scriptures that support the Catholic Church’s position.

I ask you to weigh all these things along with common sense and one thing further. In Luke 10:16, Jesus says to His apostles “He who hears you hears me, He who rejects you, rejects me”. In Matthew 16:19 and 18:18, He says “what you bind on earth will be bound in heaven”. In 1 Timothy 3:16, Paul says that the church is the Pillar and foundation of all truth and in 2 Thessalonians 2:15 he commands us to obey what the church teaches whether oral or written.

One of the strongest pillars of my opponents case is that the term purgatory is not found in scripture. The term Trinity is not found in Scripture nor is the term Incarnation nor even the term Bible. Yet, the term Church appears more than 100 times in the New Testament including Acts 9:31 where it is rendered by the Greek Ekklessia Kath Olos which is literally translated- The Catholic Church. It is that church that gave us the bible, in the 4th century and against whom Jesus promised that the gates of hell shall not prevail.

I believe I have proven to you the doctrine of purgatory today by scripture and by history and by logic. In proving it true, I hope I have started a journey in you. For if the doctrine of purgatory is possibly true as I know you must now suspect, further investigation should lead you to see that the church who defends this doctrine, does so by the Divine office Paul speaks of in Colossians 1:24-25.

Anyone wishing to read the show notes for this program can find them at deepertruthblog.com under best articles, under the Debate heading in an article called Purgatory Debate show notes.

Thank you for your time and God bless you.


HOME PAGE
Blogtalkradio Show
You Tube Channel
Twitter Page
E-MAIL US

*BEST OF DTB #70* The Catholic Defender: Study On Indulgences

Posted by John Benko - March 6th, 2011

Indulgences have been a very confusing subject for so many people.

There has been a lot of confusion coming from those who reject Purgatory, praying for the dead, and the power to “bind and loose”.

God’s revelation shows us that he loves us and makes provision for us to re-establish our relationship with God through a series of Covenants.

Beginning in the Old Testament, God gives us the choice to follow and serve him or to reject him and turn away.

However, there is a consequence for our decision:
“Moses told the people, Take these words of mine into your heart and soul. Bind them at your wrist as a sign,and let them be a pendant on your forehead. I set before you here, this day, a blessing and a curse: a blessing for obeying the commandments of the Lord, your God, which I enjoin on you today; a curse if you do not obey the commandments of the Lord, your God, but turn aside from the way I ordain for you today, to follow other gods, whom you have not known. Be careful to observe all the statutes and decrees that I set before you today” (Deuteronomy 11:18,26-28, 32).

God is giving us either a blessing for our obedience to God’s teaching and commandments or a curse for our disobedience. We are given free will to choose. With this choice, there is a consequence, an accounting that we will all be held accountable.

The Jews were given a glimpse, a foreshadow of the revelation that Jesus Christ would reveal through his new and everlasting Covenant. Jesus is the door, the rock of salvation. He holds the keys between heaven and hell. Jesus states, “Once I was dead, but now I am alive forever and ever. I hold the keys to death and the netherworld” (Revelation 1:18).

Jesus conquered death, “For Christ suffered for sins once, the righteous for the sake of the unrighteous, that he might lead you to God. Put to death in the flesh, he was brought to life in the spirit. In it he also went to preach to the spirits in prison, who had once been disobedient while God patiently waited in the days of Noah during the building of the ark, in which a few persons, eight in all, were saved through water. This prefigured baptism, which saves you now” (1 Peter 3:18-21).

Jesus released the souls of purgatory through to the time of his coming. Matthew 27:51-52 states, “And behold, the veil of the sanctuary was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth quaked, rocks were split, tombs were opened, and the bodies of many saints who had fallen asleep were raised. And coming forth from their tombs after his resurrection, they entered the holy city and appeared to many”.

Notice St. Matthew says that “many” saints were raised, not all. The implication would mean that this state (prison) was not totally emptied out.

To underscore this point, St. Paul writes, “May the Lord grant mercy to the family of Onesiphorus because he often gave me new heart and was not ashamed of my chains. But when he came to Rome, he promptly searched for me and found me. May the Lord grant him to find mercy from the Lord on that day. And you know very well the services he rendered in Ephesus” (2 Timothy 1:16).
St. Paul knew full well that this “prison” was still in existence and he prayed that the Lord would have mercy upon Onesiphorus on that day when the Lord returns.

Jesus refers to this “prison” saying, “Why do you not judge for yourselves what is right? If you are to go with your opponent before a magistrate, make an effort to settle the matter on the way; otherwise your opponent will turn you over to the judge, and the judge hand you over to the constable, and the constable throw you into “prison“. I say to you, you will not be released until you have paid the last penny” (Luke 12:57-59).

This is a clear indication of Purgatory and the importance of Indulgences. Kind of like the old TV commercials, “You can pay me now, or you can pay me later”. The truth here is that you would rather pay up front now because it will cost you a whole lot more later on down the road. Spiritually speaking, Jesus gives this as a warning to show charity in this life, to judge fairly and to live God’s commandments now.

Jesus said, “And whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come” (Matthew 12:32).

Jesus is implying that sins will be forgiven in the next age, except if they blaspheme the Holy Spirit. There have been some thought what exactly this is, I remember some said it had to do with suicide.

That may be possible, but still, if someone asked forgiveness at the last moment, might they still be forgiven thus saved by Jesus? It might be more correct to say that the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit would be to never allow the Lord into your life, to reject him to your death.

This should not be a cause of distress if you ask the Lord for forgiveness through Confession. Jesus gives this power exclusively to His Catholic Church.

Remember, Jesus holds the keys shown in Revelation 1:18, however, as the master builder, Jesus states, “And so I say to you, you are Peter (Kepha), and upon this rock (Kapha) I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it. I will give you the KEYS to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and what ever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven” (Matthew 16:18-19).

John writes, “John 20:23, “Whose sins you forgive are forgiven them, and whose sins you retain are retained”.

St. Paul would refer to this as “The Ministry Of Reconciliation” (2 Corinthians 5:18).

The Israelites would place scrolls (Mezuzah – Hebrew for door post) which held a container of verses from the Torah, a reminder of God’s presence (Deut 6:4-9).

Moses instructs the people to “bind their wrist with a sign”, and a pendant on their forehead the “Tefillin” that contained parchments of the Torah. This was a remembrance that God gave them a choice of a blessing or a curse.

Today, Christians have crucifixes and statues in their homes that reminds us of God’s presence and we also wear chains that have religious medals and crosses. We can see our Catholic Faith foundations through the lens of our Jewish roots. These things should reflect the blessing of God in our lives. We should avoid the curse of disobedience at all times.

Going back to the Apostles power to forgive sins, St. John makes a very important message saying, “I write these things to you so that you may know that you have eternal life, you who believe in the name of the Son of Man. And we have this confidence in him, that if we ask anything according to his will, he hears us. And if we know that he hears us in regard to whatever we ask, we know that what we have asked him for is ours. If anyone sees his brother sinning, if the sin is not deadly (Mortal), he should pray to God and he will give him life. This is only for those whose sin is not deadly (Mortal)” (1 John 5:13-16A).

This is important, if the sin is not deadly, you pray for them, the person can make restitution through repentance and good works. By turning away from the sin. However, if the sin is deadly, that will require more from the sinner.

St. John writes, “There is a such a thing as deadly (Mortal) sin, about which I do not say that you should pray. All wrongdoing is sin, but there is a sin that is not deadly” I John 5:16B-17).

For the sinner with deadly (Mortal) sin, they must go to the Priest and go to the Sacrament of Reconciliation. James 5:19-20 states, “My brothers, if anyone among you should stray from the truth and someone bring him back, he should know that whoever brings back a sinner from the error of his way will save his soul from death and will cover a multitude of sins”.

Indulgences are the “remission before God of the temporal punishment due to sin whose guilt has already been forgiven A properly disposed member of the Christian faithful can obtain an indulgence under prescribed conditions through the help of the Church which, as the minister of redemption, dispenses and applies with authority the treasury of the satisfactions of Christ and the saints. An indulgence is the partial if it removes part of the temporal punishment due to sin, or plenary if it removes all punishment” Catholic Catechism (1471).

The selling of Indulgences in the 16th century was never a doctrine, but a wrongful practice that some abused. During the time when the Muslims took Jerusalem and the Holy Land, this made pilgrimages very difficult.

The Stations of the Cross were placed in and near every Catholic Church so the faithful could devote time and prayer locally. It was asked of the Church if giving Alms to the poor could be used for penance.

It began innocent enough, however, this practice became an opportunity that clearly was abused. From the first century, the Church forbade anyone to channel forgiveness for money. This was called the “sin of Simony” named after Simon the magician, who offered to buy the power of the Holy Spirit (Acts 8:18-24).

At the Council of Nicaea, the controversy arose about penitents who wanted to return back to the Catholic Faith once the Roman Persecution had ended with Constantine s “Edict of Milan”.

Some of the Bishops were opposed of them returning, however, the Church ruled that they could return. They were given some tough penances, but forgiveness was given by Christ from the Cross.

The Church does not bar anyone who needs to confess their sin except in cases where the Confession is compromised, the penitent is faking it, or there is some kind of sacrilege. Jesus gave the Apostles the authority to “hold them bound” for such situations.

I know of one reported case when Padre Pio instructed someone to return to the Confessional once they were ready to confess their sin. Jesus gave him and all priests the special gift to heal people dead in sin. Let us pray that people who have abandoned the Faith (the Prodigal Son’s and Daughters), will return with thankful hearts!


HOME PAGE
Blogtalkradio Show
You Tube Channel
Twitter Page
E-MAIL US

*BEST OF DTB #69* God’s Girl: Marriage: Heaven / Hell?

Posted by John Benko - March 6th, 2011


Marriage: Heaven / Hell ?

Posted on March 5, 2011 by Jojo

It’s your choice.

“I have taken you into my arms, & I love you, & I prefer you to my life itself. For the present life is nothing, & my most ardent dream is to spend it with you in such a way that we may be assured of not being separated in the life reserved for us….I place your love above all things, & nothing would be more bitter or painful to me than to be of a different mind than you.” -St.John Chrysostom, advises young husbands to say to their wives.

Marriage was designed by God to Image Him more than anything else.
Many people look at us as a couple, & remark on our delight in each other, in the youthfulness of our Love. My husband sends a Love text message whilst I’m having coffee with friends & the look on my face gives away the romantic exchange … Frequently we are asked, “how long have you been married?” … & then comes a familiar choked shock over the answer, thinking that our romance should have grown cold by this stage, but instead is fresh & vibrant as young lovers.
Many envy what we have, as though we were somehow ‘lucky’. But I want to say … it’s not luck, but God’s grace & the strategies He gives. Available for all who are called to live Married Love. It is His Love that is living in our hearts for each other. I will attempt to tell of the decisions we had to make to keep our Love ever-new, or eternal. How we set our sails for success. It’s not just chance. It’s a decision. A firm resolve. To Love no matter what. To believe. To trust in God & persevere. To BE Happily Married. It’s an attitude, … that took us some time to develop & the perfecting of it is perpetual! :) But worth more than silver or gold.

I needed to wake up & realize “the battle is not with flesh & blood but with powers & principalities” … in the thick of battle we often get punch drunk, the dust of the battle field, mingled with blood, sweat & tears distorts vision, & the capacity to reason well. Then it dawned on me:… we were are on the SAME SIDE of the battle for Marital Bliss, we could stop aiming darts & daggers at each other & in exchange: guard each others back. Minister to my beloved rather than being on the offense.
There is an enemy of Love. An enemy of Marriage. An enemy of Holiness & Happiness. This enemy hates & attempts to destroy anything that resembles God. Faithfulness. Kindness. Steadfast Love. Family: the Communion of Love imaging the Trinity. What does this mean? How can we strategically win this battle, with the least amount of damage? For me, it meant I had to choose to Believe marriage could be Happy, Holy, just when everything around me seemed contrary. That I had to put Faith in God’s ability to bring this about & not lose Hope. I had to Trust. I had to refocus… not on the apparent issue but on God’s view. To gain eternal perspective. Where is the prize in winning an argument, by loosing charity? When I made these decisions… many a fight (that had blown up to catastrophic proportions, as they seem to with the least provocation!) stopped almost instantly. It has such Power.
Putting the other first … basics : “if you are faithful in little things I will put you over bigger things” … so broken down day-to-day living, all you do: consider the other first. ie: I pour his coffee before my own. I choose his favorite meal over what I might be feeling like. Also, I choose to pray daily for my beloved, first thing in the morning & all through the day. I help him realize his dreams… He becomes top priority.
Rather than changing him… I had to choose to over look his apparent failing & change myself. This is the most amazing spiritual tactic for victory. It changes the whole playing field & levels the pitch. Suddenly things that have been an issue for years … dissipate. What seemed so impossible… can’t be recalled !
I made the resolve to become my beloved best friend as we once were before courting, his ‘cheerleader’! His Life-Support… mouth-to-mouth included :) , I had to be his Life Coach & Life-Giving Lover all rolled into one! ! What a brilliant task set out by God Himself. An awesome fun filled privileged: realizing I was called by God to inspire greatness in him & with him as a sacred mission!
I try to honor & respect him as a man & the God-chosen head of our home. The question is how? I used to hear these words ‘honor & respect’ & get all kinds of odd interpretations! Deformed by fallen man into Domination. This is not going to inspire anyone to ‘submit’ with the right spirit! So lets look at these words with fresh understanding. One of the ways I honor my beloved, is to appear in a manner that does him proud. I try to look naturally lovely, …I love it when he grows taller as I enter the room when we’re in a public setting, & winks his approval. One of the ways I now see ‘Respect’ is the understanding that he is a man, respected as one, not a half-wit because he may hold a different opinion to mine, not a child who needs correcting, but the man who has been placed over our household in sacred leadership. I need to trust God’s choice in this! … boy, that took some time! :) …& now, I can’t believe how freeing it is to leave it in their hands (God + Ricky). To not be afraid but to rest secure that all things work to good.



keep your Love fresh

Ricky & I made a commitment to continuously work on our Selves & our Marriage, with our Relationship with God as First Place in our lives, as This Relationship inspires all others.

We went for Marriage Coaching. Thanks to “The Love Dare” - 40 days challenge to a better marriage. This was truly blessed experience, please don’t miss the opportunity. But be sure to go through the The Alexander House because they work wonders! We had Matt & Mindy Dalton as our Coaching Couple, & did sessions via Skype! They were brilliant at tweaking what we had & giving us wings to fly to new heights. Mindy said, “We don’t just want your marriage to merely survive, we want it to Thrive!” . Living in the J.P.II – B.XVI Generation (John Paul II – Benedict XVI ) we leap hearing the Call to Greatness, the call to be ALL we can be, leaving aside the grey existence of the norm & rising to new heights of freedom borne on the wings of Grace! His Power, His Enabling, His Victory … our “YES! be it done to me…” or, more simply put:… Amen. :)
There is something very dynamic about this way of Living. It brings a sparkle to every day, problems become wonderful gifts, challenging us to perfection. “Be perfect as your Father in Heaven is perfect.” We can do this not because we’re great, but because He is Great. It frees you up to shine with His glory & not feel like you should hide in false humility, you can be happy, you can have a happy home, & mystical marriage… what is impossible for man, is possible with God. If you’re a Christian, living this redeemed life, is… expected! Or we are refusing His gifts won at such an enormous price. We need to Image God, True Love, & allow this dynamic power of Love to fill the house then spill over the gate to all the world.
Challenge the culture that jokes demeaningly of Marriage & erodes the heart of what God made holy. Guard your Marriage Vocation, a holy call from the Lord, not a ‘ball & chain”. What about Guys Nights Out / Girls Nights Out, whats going on here? Singles who hook up now & then? Married but playing the Single Card? I mean, are you married or single? Which is it? There is only one correct answer. “What God has joined let no man separate.”
We delight in being One Heart, One Mind, One Spirit. Never allow this to be taken from you. There is a lot of pressure out there to socialize in opposite directions. Don’t fall for it.
I’ll have to post on this topic again … it’s going to take me… 4 Eva :)
… God bless!

HOME PAGE
Blogtalkradio Show
You Tube Channel
Twitter Page
E-MAIL US


*BEST OF DTB #68* God’s Girl: Ponder… for the Love of Life

Posted by John Benko - March 5th, 2011


Ponder… for the Love of Life

Posted on March 5, 2011 by Jojo


” I set before you, Life & Death,
Little Feet

Blessing & Curse….”


The Guardian Angel: Chastisement

Posted by John Benko - March 4th, 2011

As we watch what is happening all around the world and this country, we continue to think that is them, and we are different — those things will not touch us.
Ezekiel 35:6: “Since you did not hate bloodshed, bloodshed will pursue you.”
…it sickens me to say it, because of my children and grandchildren and those of my neighbors and friends, but when it rains, it will rain on the good and the bad. We will see famine and hunger like never before as the numbers will grow of those that do not have*** we will see blood in the streets*** we will see government taking away our last vestiges of freedom …yet we continue to sleep and think that because we are Americans, we can pull it out, even at the last moment…
Preparing people in spirit, mind, and body will be the only thing that will help them get through the tribulations that are coming. … HE will bring a great chastisement on a nation to put them to their knees to look to HIM instead of themselves. Has God gotten to a point in the past where HE will not listen***
Isaiah 1:15: “When you spread out your hands in prayer, I will hide my eyes from you; even if you offer many prayers, I will not listen. Your hands are full of blood.”
Amen to every word, Guardian Angel!
The truth is that we have not truly hated bloodshed — or any other form of wickedness. We have only very selectively perceived it and very selectively disapproved of it, and remained silent when our friends and allies engaged in it, as they remained silent in turn for us.
Two great quotes from Tom Hoefling’s blog:
“Brethren, our preaching will bear its legitimate fruits. If immorality prevails in the land, the fault is ours in a great degree. If there is a decay of conscience, the pulpit is responsible for it. If the public press lacks moral discrimination, the pulpit is responsible for it. If the church is degenerate and worldly, the pulpit is responsible for it. If the world loses its interest in religion, the pulpit is responsible for it. If Satan rules in our halls of legislation, the pulpit is responsible for it. If our politics become so corrupt that the very foundations of our government are ready to fall away, the pulpit is responsible for it.”
– Charles G. Finney, Dec 4, 1873

“A day of grace is yet held out to us. Both North and South have been guilty before God; and the Christian church has a heavy account to answer. Not by combining together, to protect injustice and cruelty, and making a common capital of sin, is this Union to be saved,–but by repentance, justice and mercy; for, not surer is the eternal law by which the millstone sinks in the ocean, than that stronger law, by which injustice and cruelty shall bring on nations the wrath of Almighty God!” — Harriet Beecher Stowe, Uncle Tom’s Cabin


HOME PAGE
Blogtalkradio Show
You Tube Channel
Twitter Page
E-MAIL US

*BEST OF DTB #67* We’re Pro-Life, We Don’t Shoot Our Wounded

Posted by John Benko - March 3rd, 2011


HOME PAGE
Blogtalkradio Show
You Tube Channel
Twitter Page
E-MAIL US

I woke up this morning after having dreamed of an old high school friend I had to drop because she started picking off the men in my life to have sex with. If I was close to them, she’d get closer. I didn’t know it at the time, but her promiscuity was a salve she was applying to a very big wound.
Someone had told her that her greatest attribute was her sexuality. She tested that theory and became pregnant. Her parents, overgrown hippies, helped her to an abortion, then a few more, all the while supporting their daughter’s “choices.” She was buying urine to submit for her drug tests the I last heard from her.
She’s resurfaced in my life to a certain degree, with a child. I’d like to say she’s had a wonderful change and is now a rock solid personality with the drugs and alcohol a thing of the past, but I honestly don’t know. I’ve not initiated contact for various reasons. If my life was open for a transformation, surely hers was, too. I content myself to pray for her when she comes across my radar and I pray for her beautiful child.
Abortion didn’t help my friend. It made her miseries harder to bear. After that first one, she wrote a few poems, took a stuffed animal to help another friend grieve through her abortion, she talked. After the second one, that girl disappeared–the one who could express her emotions and use them to connect with others in any way I understood. In her place was a young woman who would do just about anything to go numb.
We had a lot in common. We both spun out of control in our own way. There was one major difference between us. Growing up, politically I was Pro-Choice and she was not. I was the Pro-Choicer who would never have had an abortion. She didn’t like abortion but had several. Was that the defining difference? I can’t say. What I can say is that she is part of the reason I became Pro-Life later. Some of the conversations we had jarred me in my Pro-Choice rhetoric just enough to nag at me for 20 or so years until I took a second look.
Our friendship didn’t last, but her influence did. She showed me the pain abortion can cause a woman and the havoc the aftermath can wreak in an already complicated life. Hers is one of the many faces I place in the forefront of my mind when I write or speak about abortion, so that I am careful with such painful truths.
In the build-up to the 40 Days for Life, keep my friend in mind when you march, speak, and write. Pray for her. Think about her. Most of all, be careful with her. She may be listening.
The other side shut her down and still says “Get over it” to its victims. We, on the Life side, need to remember that zeal and vehemence are not the same. One is inviting, the other vainglorious. I’ve gotten over-enthusiastic and shut down an opportunity a time or two. It happens. With my dream tonight, God is reminding me why I’m writing, who it hurts, why I must be compassionate, so I’m sharing it with you. Remember that we have Joy, Life, Truth, Reason, and Logic on our side. They can speak for themselves if we let them. We just have to let them.

*BEST OF DTB #66* God’s Girl: Calvinism vs Catholicism by Ross Earl Hoffman

Posted by John Benko - March 2nd, 2011

Calvinism vs Catholicism

Mar 1st, 2011
The TRUTH will set you free… but first it’ll make you miserable! :)
Gods Girl

(Ross Earl Hoffman, an FB friend of mine, posted this recently on Facebook, I just had to share it with you, so I got his permission to do so! He is bubbling over with joy in the Holy Spirit: forever “walking & leaping & praising God” a Convert to Catholicism. Welcome Home Ross !)
PREDESTINATION, SALVATION, AND DAMNATION
Calvinism and Catholicism Contrasted
CALVINISM IS UNREASONABLE
Calvin located the reason of predestination solely in the absolute will of God. But by making God alone responsible for everything, Calvin abolished the free cooperation of the will in obtaining eternal happiness. Therefore he was logically forced to admit an irresistible efficacious grace, to deny the freedom of the will when influenced by grace, and to completely reject supernatural merits (as a secondary reason for eternal happiness).
Not only is God completely responsible for the salvation of the elect, but He must also be responsible for the damnation of the reprobate, even to the point of directly willing their sins. Since God wills everything good for the elect, as well as everything bad for the reprobate, Calvin maintained that Christ died only for the elect (this is challenged by Geisler’s recent book Chosen But Free, see link below):
“As Scripture, then, clearly shows, we say that God once established by his eternal and unchangeable plan those whom he long before determined once for all to receive into salvation, and those whom, on the other hand, he would devote to destruction.
“We assert that, with respect to the elect, this plan was founded upon his freely given mercy, without regard to human worth; but by his just and irreprehensible but incomprehensible judgment he has barred the door of life to those whom he has given over to damnation.” (John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion Book III:21:7)
Salvation and damnation depend wholly on the will of God — man is completely predetermined to one or the other by irresistible grace or the lack thereof, without any cooperation or resistance of his will. Since grace is irresistible, the will of the predestined is not free to cooperate with grace to perform meritorious good works, and so salvation is purely arbitrary. Even more disturbing, since concupiscence is likewise irresistible without God’s grace, the will of the reprobate is not really free to sin and perform culpably evil works, and so damnation is not caused by demerits.
For Calvin, whom God selects, He saves; whom God rejects, He damns.
CALVINISM IS UNBIBLICAL
But consider what this means and whether this is biblical :
1. No truly free will (denied by experience, and by the Gospel commands to repent, reform, obey the commandments, perform works of charity, and persevere to the end).
2. Thus no merit or demerit (denied by the whole Bible which testifies to the rewards and punishments God will apportion to all men according to their deeds, e.g. Matt 16:27; Rom 2:5-10; 2 Cor 5:10; Rev 22:11-12; etc).
3. God desires salvation only for the elect. (Denied by 1 Tim 2:4; 2 Peter 3:9; Matt 23:37; Ezek 18:23-32; 33:11; etc).
4. Christ died only for the elect. (Denied by John 3:16-17; 4:42; 1 John 2:2; 4:9-14; Rom 5:6,18; 2 Cor 5:14-15; 1 Tim 2:6; 4:10; etc).
5. God provides grace only to the elect. (Denied by Titus 2:11; John 1:9,16; Rom 2:4; etc).
6. God directly predetermines the salvation of the elect, including their good works. (This ignores any cooperation of the will with grace).
7. God directly predetermines the damnation of the reprobate, including their sins. (This is denied by James 1:13-14; Sirach 15:11-20; 1 Cor 10:13; and ignores any true resistance and rejection by the will).
8. The elect will be saved with no merit of their own. (This denies heavenly reward).
9. The reprobate will be damned for no fault of their own. (This denies true guilt and deserved punishment).
Between these two extremes the Catholic dogma of predestination keeps the golden mean, because it regards eternal happiness primarily as the work of God and His grace, but secondarily as the fruit and reward of the meritorious actions of the predestined.
CATHOLIC TEACHING ON PREDESTINATION AND SALVATION
The process of predestination and salvation consists of the following five steps :
A. The first grace of vocation, especially faith as the beginning, foundation, and root of justification (Council of Trent, session VI, chapter 8)
B. A number of additional, actual graces for the successful accomplishment of justification and sanctification (1 Cor 6:11)
C. Justification itself as the beginning of the state of grace and love
D. Final perseverance or at least the grace of a happy death
E. The admission to eternal bliss and glorification (Rom 8:28-30)
The Calvinist position is consistent with itself, but is not consistent with human experience or the Scriptures. It cannot be reconciled with the cooperation and resistance of free will, sin and virtue, the possible loss of grace, punishment and reward, and the universality of redemption and grace. Calvin’s God is arbitrary and despotic.
The Catholic position is consistent with itself, with human experience, and with the Scriptures. God’s foreknowledge and foreordination of the elect to heavenly glory includes His universal desire and sufficient grace to save all men, our free cooperation with His grace, good works which truly merit heavenly reward, and the real possibility — during this life of testing and pilgrimage — of rejecting grace and salvation and thus deserving the punishments of hell.
Calvin located the reason of predestination solely in the absolute will of God. But by making God alone responsible for everything, Calvin abolished the free cooperation of the will in obtaining eternal happiness. Therefore he was logically forced to admit an irresistible efficacious grace, to deny the freedom of the will when influenced by grace, and to completely reject supernatural merits (as a secondary reason for eternal happiness).
Not only is God completely responsible for the salvation of the elect, but He must also be responsible for the damnation of the reprobate, even to the point of directly willing their sins. Since God wills everything good for the elect, as well as everything bad for the reprobate, Calvin maintained that Christ died only for the elect (this is challenged by Geisler’s recent book Chosen But Free, see link below):
“As Scripture, then, clearly shows, we say that God once established by his eternal and unchangeable plan those whom he long before determined once for all to receive into salvation, and those whom, on the other hand, he would devote to destruction.
“We assert that, with respect to the elect, this plan was founded upon his freely given mercy, without regard to human worth; but by his just and irreprehensible but incomprehensible judgment he has barred the door of life to those whom he has given over to damnation.” (John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion Book III:21:7)
Salvation and damnation depend wholly on the will of God — man is completely predetermined to one or the other by irresistible grace or the lack thereof, without any cooperation or resistance of his will. Since grace is irresistible, the will of the predestined is not free to cooperate with grace to perform meritorious good works, and so salvation is purely arbitrary. Even more disturbing, since concupiscence is likewise irresistible without God’s grace, the will of the reprobate is not really free to sin and perform culpably evil works, and so damnation is not caused by demerits.
For Calvin, whom God selects, He saves; whom God rejects, He damns.
But consider what this means and whether this is biblical :
1. No truly free will (denied by experience, and by the Gospel commands to repent, reform, obey the commandments, perform works of charity, and persevere to the end).
2. Thus no merit or demerit (denied by the whole Bible which testifies to the rewards and punishments God will apportion to all men according to their deeds, e.g. Matt 16:27; Rom 2:5-10; 2 Cor 5:10; Rev 22:11-12; etc).
3. God desires salvation only for the elect. (Denied by 1 Tim 2:4; 2 Peter 3:9; Matt 23:37; Ezek 18:23-32; 33:11; etc).
4. Christ died only for the elect. (Denied by John 3:16-17; 4:42; 1 John 2:2; 4:9-14; Rom 5:6,18; 2 Cor 5:14-15; 1 Tim 2:6; 4:10; etc).
5. God provides grace only to the elect. (Denied by Titus 2:11; John 1:9,16; Rom 2:4; etc).
6. God directly predetermines the salvation of the elect, including their good works. (This ignores any cooperation of the will with grace).
7. God directly predetermines the damnation of the reprobate, including their sins. (This is denied by James 1:13-14; Sirach 15:11-20; 1 Cor 10:13; and ignores any true resistance and rejection by the will).
8. The elect will be saved with no merit of their own. (This denies heavenly reward).
9. The reprobate will be damned for no fault of their own. (This denies true guilt and deserved punishment).
Between these two extremes the Catholic dogma of predestination keeps the golden mean, because it regards eternal happiness primarily as the work of God and His grace, but secondarily as the fruit and reward of the meritorious actions of the predestined.

The Loving Arms of the Church

CATHOLIC TEACHING ON PREDESTINATION AND SALVATION
The process of predestination and salvation consists of the following five steps :
A. The first grace of vocation, especially faith as the beginning, foundation, and root of justification (Council of Trent, session VI, chapter 8)
B. A number of additional, actual graces for the successful accomplishment of justification and sanctification (1 Cor 6:11)
C. Justification itself as the beginning of the state of grace and love
D. Final perseverance or at least the grace of a happy death
E. The admission to eternal bliss and glorification (Rom 8:28-30)
The Calvinist position is consistent with itself, but is not consistent with human experience or the Scriptures. It cannot be reconciled with the cooperation and resistance of free will, sin and virtue, the possible loss of grace, punishment and reward, and the universality of redemption and grace. Calvin’s God is arbitrary and despotic.
The Catholic position is consistent with itself, with human experience, and with the Scriptures. God’s foreknowledge and foreordination of the elect to heavenly glory includes His universal desire and sufficient grace to save all men, our free cooperation with His grace, good works which truly merit heavenly reward, and the real possibility — during this life of testing and pilgrimage — of rejecting grace and salvation and thus deserving the punishments of hell.
IMPORTANT DISTINCTIONS
1. Predestination is not predetermination :
“Predestination is nothing else than the foreknowledge and foreordaining of those gracious gifts which make certain the salvation of all who are saved.” (St. Augustine, Persever 14:35)
Predestination is God’s decree of the happiness of the elect. God’s infallible foreknowledge (and thus predestination also) includes free will. God’s foreknowledge cannot force upon man unavoidable coercion, for the simple reason that it is at bottom nothing else than the eternal vision of the future historical actuality. God foresees the free activity of a man precisely as that individual is willing to shape it, predestination is not predetermination of the human will.
2. Election is a consequence of God’s foreknowledge :
By definition, the ELECT are those whom God infallibly foresees will be saved (Rom 8:28-30). By this definition, it is impossible for the elect to be lost, precisely because God foreknows who will not be lost. But since election depends on God’s infallible foreknowledge, we simply have no way of knowing whether or not we are in that category — God knows with certainty His elect, but we do not. The elect are predestined in the sense that God knows them, and enables them by grace, to be saved.
3. Free will can resist and reject God’s grace :
“You stiff-necked people…you always resist the Holy Spirit” (Acts 7:51). The angels possessed grace and perfectly intact intellect, and yet many of them freely sinned and rejected God. Adam and Eve possessed grace and a perfectly intact nature, and yet they freely sinned. How much more so is it possible for the born-again Christian, who possesses grace but also a wounded nature and a darkened intellect, to sin also. Paul mentions sins which keep a man from the Kingdom of God: fornication, adultery, homosexuality, theft, greed, and so on (1 Cor 6:9-10).
When Jesus was expressly asked what one must do to gain eternal life, he answered, “keep the commandments,” and went on to list the moral commandments of the Decalogue (Matt 19:16-21). Revelation describes those whose lot is the burning pool of fire and sulfur, the second death: “cowards, the unfaithful, the depraved, murderers, the unchaste” and so on (Rev 21:8). Aren’t born-again Christians capable of these sins? And if they die in these sins, how can they possibly inherit heaven? If Adam and Eve could fall from grace, surely we can fall from grace as well. Surely we can harden our hearts and resist the Holy Spirit.
4. We cannot confuse Election with being “Born Again” :
The set of those who are “born again” (in Catholic and historic Christian understanding those who have been regenerated “of water and Spirit” in the Sacrament of Baptism — John 3:3,5; Acts 2:38) is not necessarily co-extensive with the set of those who will persevere and gain eternal life. Born-again Christians can and (sadly) do fall away. Otherwise free will and (mortal) sin are merely fictitious for a Christian during this life of testing and pilgrimage. Otherwise all the language in Scripture of persevering to the end in order to be saved (cf. Matt 10:22; 24:13; Phil 2:12-13) makes no sense.
CALVINISM AND CATHOLICISM CONTRASTED
Calvin : God’s sovereignty determines the will.
Catholic : God’s sovereignty includes free will.
Calvin : Predestination as predetermination.
Catholic : Predestination as infallible foreknowledge.
Calvin : God desires only the salvation of the elect.
Catholic : God desires the salvation of all.
Calvin : God provides grace only to the elect.
Catholic : God provides grace to all, though not all accept it.

Calvin : Christ died only for the elect.
Catholic : Christ died for all men.
Calvin : God predetermines some for hell.
Catholic : Men merit hell by their own wickedness.
Calvin : The elect include all those born-again.
Catholic : The elect are those who persevere to the end.
Calvin : Grace co-opts human free will.
Catholic : Grace perfects the free will that cooperates.
Calvin : Those in grace (born-again) can’t fall away.
Catholic : Those in grace can freely sin and lose grace.
Calvin : The elect will unfailingly persevere.
Catholic : The elect are those who have persevered.
Calvin : The elect are assured of their salvation.
Catholic : Yes, but only God knows who they are.
Calvin : Predestination eliminates merit and guilt.
Catholic : Predestination includes merit and guilt.
The Pelagian heretics held that man alone (apart from God’s grace) is responsible for his salvation. Calvinists start with the opposite premise that God alone is responsible for man’s salvation
CALVINISM IS UNREASONABLE
Calvin located the reason of predestination solely in the absolute will of God. But by making God alone responsible for everything, Calvin abolished the free cooperation of the will in obtaining eternal happiness.
Calvin located the reason of predestination solely in the absolute will of God. But by making God alone responsible for everything, Calvin abolished the free cooperation of the will in obtaining eternal happiness. Therefore he was logically forced to admit an irresistible efficacious grace, to deny the freedom of the will when influenced by grace, and to completely reject supernatural merits (as a secondary reason for eternal happiness).
Not only is God completely responsible for the salvation of the elect, but He must also be responsible for the damnation of the reprobate, even to the point of directly willing their sins. Since God wills everything good for the elect, as well as everything bad for the reprobate, Calvin maintained that Christ died only for the elect (this is challenged by Geisler’s recent book Chosen But Free, see link below):
“As Scripture, then, clearly shows, we say that God once established by his eternal and unchangeable plan those whom he long before determined once for all to receive into salvation, and those whom, on the other hand, he would devote to destruction.
“We assert that, with respect to the elect, this plan was founded upon his freely given mercy, without regard to human worth; but by his just and irreprehensible but incomprehensible judgment he has barred the door of life to those whom he has given over to damnation.” (John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion Book III:21:7)
Salvation and damnation depend wholly on the will of God — man is completely predetermined to one or the other by irresistible grace or the lack thereof, without any cooperation or resistance of his will. Since grace is irresistible, the will of the predestined is not free to cooperate with grace to perform meritorious good works, and so salvation is purely arbitrary. Even more disturbing, since concupiscence is likewise irresistible without God’s grace, the will of the reprobate is not really free to sin and perform culpably evil works, and so damnation is not caused by demerits.
For Calvin, whom God selects, He saves; whom God rejects, He damns.
CALVINISM IS UNBIBLICAL
But consider what this means and whether this is biblical :
1. No truly free will (denied by experience, and by the Gospel commands to repent, reform, obey the commandments, perform works of charity, and persevere to the end).
2. Thus no merit or demerit (denied by the whole Bible which testifies to the rewards and punishments God will apportion to all men according to their deeds, e.g. Matt 16:27; Rom 2:5-10; 2 Cor 5:10; Rev 22:11-12; etc).
3. God desires salvation only for the elect. (Denied by 1 Tim 2:4; 2 Peter 3:9; Matt 23:37; Ezek 18:23-32; 33:11; etc).
4. Christ died only for the elect. (Denied by John 3:16-17; 4:42; 1 John 2:2; 4:9-14; Rom 5:6,18; 2 Cor 5:14-15; 1 Tim 2:6; 4:10; etc).
5. God provides grace only to the elect. (Denied by Titus 2:11; John 1:9,16; Rom 2:4; etc).
6. God directly predetermines the salvation of the elect, including their good works. (This ignores any cooperation of the will with grace).
7. God directly predetermines the damnation of the reprobate, including their sins. (This is denied by James 1:13-14; Sirach 15:11-20; 1 Cor 10:13; and ignores any true resistance and rejection by the will).
8. The elect will be saved with no merit of their own. (This denies heavenly reward).
9. The reprobate will be damned for no fault of their own. (This denies true guilt and deserved punishment).
Between these two extremes the Catholic dogma of predestination keeps the golden mean, because it regards eternal happiness primarily as the work of God and His grace, but secondarily as the fruit and reward of the meritorious actions of the predestined.
CATHOLIC TEACHING ON PREDESTINATION AND SALVATION
The process of predestination and salvation consists of the following five steps :
A. The first grace of vocation, especially faith as the beginning, foundation, and root of justification (Council of Trent, session VI, chapter 8)
B. A number of additional, actual graces for the successful accomplishment of justification and sanctification (1 Cor 6:11)
C. Justification itself as the beginning of the state of grace and love
D. Final perseverance or at least the grace of a happy death
E. The admission to eternal bliss and glorification (Rom 8:28-30)
The Calvinist position is consistent with itself, but is not consistent with human experience or the Scriptures. It cannot be reconciled with the cooperation and resistance of free will, sin and virtue, the possible loss of grace, punishment and reward, and the universality of redemption and grace. Calvin’s God is arbitrary and despotic.
The Catholic position is consistent with itself, with human experience, and with the Scriptures. God’s foreknowledge and foreordination of the elect to heavenly glory includes His universal desire and sufficient grace to save all men, our free cooperation with His grace, good works which truly merit heavenly reward, and the real possibility — during this life of testing and pilgrimage — of rejecting grace and salvation and thus deserving the punishments of hell.

St. Peters


HOME PAGE
Blogtalkradio Show
You Tube Channel
Twitter Page
E-MAIL US